Каббалистические видения

[4]Mundaka UpanishadW,4, trans. R. C. Zaehner, inHindu Scriptures(Lon­don: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1966), p. 208.

[5]See Heinrich Zimmer,Philosophies of India(Princeton, NJ: Princeton Uni­versity Press, 1971), pp. 366-367.

[6]Gershom Scholem, "Adam Kadmon (Primordial Man)," inEncyclopedia Judaica(Jerusalem: Keter Publishing, 1971), 2:248.

[7]Giovanni Filoramo,A History of Gnosticism,trans. Anthony Alcock (Cam­bridge: Basil Blackwell, 1990), p. 65.

[8]Kurt Rudolph,Gnosis: The Nature and History of Gnosticism,trans. Robert M. Wilson (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987), p. 109.

[9]Как мы видели, Юнг полагал, что этот текст был написан христианином, изображающим из себя еврея. Однако, Патай видит, что эт самый еврейский из алхимических трактатов.

[10]Jung,Mysterium Coniunctionis, CW 14,p. 50. On Eleazar's being Jewish,see p. 415.

[11]p.394; Jung,Psychology and Alchemy,CW12,p.319.

[12]Jung,Mysterium Coniunctionis, CW\4,p. 386.

[13]p. 390. The unity(yechidah)of one of the Kabbalist's highest worlds(Atziluthor "Emanation").

[14]p. 407

[15]p. 390

[16]p. 409

[17]p. 16

[18]Gershom Scholem,Kabbalah(Jerusalem: Keter, 1974), Part II, "Samael," pp. 385-388.

[19]Jung,Mysterium Coniunctionis, CW\4,pp. 415-417

[20]p. 418

[21]p. 429.

[22]p. 429

[23]On Hegel's notion of God (the Absolute), seeThe Logic of Hegel,trans. Wil­liam Wallace, from theEncyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences,2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1892);Hegel's Science of Logic(1812-1816), trans. A. V. Miller, foreword by J. N. Findlay (New York: Humani­ties Press, 1969); also, J. N. Findlay,Hegel: A Re-examination(New York: Oxford University Press, 1958); W. T. Stace,The Philosophy of Hegel(New York: Dover, 1955; originally published in 1924); F. G. Weiss,Hegel: The Essential Writings(New York: Harper & Row, 1974); and Cyril O'Regan,The Heterodox Hegel(Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1994).

[24]Jung,Mysterium Coniunctionis, CW 14,p. 383.

[25]p. 400

[26],p. 128

[27]See Jung, "Archaic Man," inCivilization in Transition,CW10, pp. 50-73, § 105.

[28]Jung,Mysterium Coniunctionis, CW 14,p. 420.

[29]p. 7.

[30]p. 407.

[31]The distinction between "circles" and "lines" is discussed in Chayyim Vital,Sefer Etz Chayyim(Tel Aviv, 1960), 1:1 b, and VIII: 1. See the discussion: "The Creation of the Sefirot: Circular and Linear Models," in Sanford Drob,Sym­bols of the Kabbalah(Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, 2000), pp. 167-171

[32]Jung,Mysterium Coniunctionis, CW 14,p. 414.

[33]pp. 412-413, note