|
1998, w 5. с.76–87. 6. Кольцова М.М. Ребенок учится говорить. М, 1979. 7. Лурия А.Р. Язык и сознание. М.: Изд=во МГУ, 1979. 8. Сергиенко Е.А., Рязанова Т.Б., Виленская Г.А., Дозорцева А.В. Возможности использования теста Бейли для оценки раннего развития//Психологическое обозрение. 1996. N2. C.36–41. 76 9. Солнцева Л.И. Развитие компенсаторных процессов у слепых детей дошкольного возраста. М.: «Педагогика», 1980. 10. Ушакова Т.Н. Речевой онтогенез. В кн. под ред. В.Н.Дружинина, Д.В.Ушакова Когнитивная психология. М.: «PerSe», 2002, с. 407–420. 11. Цейтлин С.Н. Язык и ребенок: Лингвистика детской речи. М.: «Владос», 2000. 12. Acredolo L., Goodwyn S. Symbolic gesturing in normal infants // Child development. 1988. V.59. p. 450–466. 13. Andersen E., Dunlea A., Kekelis L. Blind children’s language: resolv= ing some differences // J. of Child Language. 1984. V.11. P. 645–664. 14. Bates E. Language and context. NY: AP, 1976. 15. Bates E., Benigni L., et al. The emergence of simbol. NY: AP, 1979. 16. Bloom L. One word at the time. The Hague, 1973. 17. Bigelow A. Early world of blind children // J. of Child Language. 1987. V.14. P.47–56. 18. Bigelow A. Relationship between the development of language and thought in young blind children // J. of Visual Impairment and Blind= ness. 1990. V.84. P.414–419. 19. Brambring M. Development of blind children: A longitudinal study. Special research unit on prevention and intervention in childhood and adolescence. SFB 227 — project A3. Preprint No.68, 1992. 20. Chomsky N. Reflections on language. Pantheon, New York, 1975. 21. Chomsky N. Linguistics and cognitive science: problems and myster= ies//The chomskyan turn/Kasher A. (Ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, 1991. 22. Churchland, P. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 23. Dunlea A. Vision and emergence of meaning. Cambridge: CUP. 1989Big= elow A. Relationship between the development of language and thought in young blind children // J. of Visual Impairment and Blindness. 1990. V.84. P. 414–419. 24. Dunlea A., Andersen E. The emergence process: Cjyceptual and lin= guistic influences on morphoklogical development // First language, 1992, v.12.p. 95–115. 25. Fodor J.A. The present status of the innateness controversy // Repre= sentations: philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive sci= ence / Fodor J.A. (Ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981. 26. Fodor J.A. Concepts: where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford: Ox= ford University Press, 1998. 27. Fraiberg S. Insights from the blind: Comparative studies of blind and sighted infants. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1977. — 56 —
|