High Hume (Биовласть и биополитика в обществе риска) (Чешко В.Ф.)

From the phenomenological point of view logical construct «bio-power» is created by the certain single conceptual field, in the sphere of influence of which potentially and topically included

I. natural science –

a) theoretical biology (genetics),

b) (bio-)medicine,

c) (bio-, gene)technology, from one side and

II. social and humanitarian knowledge –

(bio-)policy,
(bio-)ethics,
(bio-)philosophy,
(bio-aspects of) legislation,
(bio-) theory of culture,
demography,
sociology, with other.

Two-dimensional (cultural and socio-economical policy) political space in the epoch of technologies of the guided evolution acquires the third dimensional - bio-political. The bio-political decisions accepted now cast aside the longest shade on the future of humanity. Cost of choice in this case in long perspective most high is a fate of humanity and fate of reasonable life. One of base principles of classic ethics and methodologies of science was ethics neutrality of objective scientific knowledge. Now on changing a removal from the scientific theories of socio-ethics, ideological and political components other strategy comes: authentication and research of such components, development of the system of criteria in accordance with which scientific theories and scientific facts are subject an estimation, foremost, from point of social and cultural consequences, the influence on somatic life of man in this world.

Оглавление

Предисловие

Социокультурные и ментальные истоки биополитических коллизий

Статус биовласти в «обществе риска»

Технология биовласти

Институциализация биовласти

Биоэтика как методология осуществления биовласти

Эпистемологические и ценностные аспекты биовласти

Биполитические конфликты ХХ века. Исторический обзор

Евгеника. США и Западная Европа (1900-1945 годы)

Расовая гигиена. Германия (1933-1945 годы)

Мичуринская генетика. СССР (1929-1964 годы)