Гражданское общество: политический режим в контексте биовласти Биполитические и биоэтические дилеммы репродуктивных технологий. Проблема генетической дискриминации Человек как субъект и объект управляемой эволюции Информационное общество и технологии управляемой эволюции Генно-культурная и технокультурная коэволюция в зоне эволюционной сингулярности Гражданское общество. На пороге «постчеловеческого будущего» (США, 1998-2007)
Introduction. Genesis and evolution of bio-power3 Socio-cultural and mental sources of bio-political collisions19 Status of bio-power in «society of risk»21 Technology of bio-power23 Institutialization of bio-power32 Bio-ethics as methodology of realization of bio-power29 Epistemological and valued aspects of bio-power32 Bio-political conflicts of 20th centuries. Historical review39 Eugenics. The USA and Western Europe (1900-1945)39 Racial hygiene. Germany (1933-1945 )50 Michurin`s genetics. The USSR (1929-1964)53 Genetic consequences of nuclear tests. The USA and USSR (1945-1963)55 Genetic manipulations as source of bio-political risk. The USA, Western Europe (1975-2002)56 A bio-policy is in the system of globalization65 Regional bio-political problems of post-Soviet of geopolitical space71 Political potential of theoretical biology78 Theory of gene-cultural coevolution: bio-political aspect91 Politized science94 Integration of biology in the spiritual culture of modern civilization120 Socio-political problems of bio-power 141 Civil society: the political regime is in the context of bio-power141 Bio-political and bio-ethics dilemmas of gene technologies.154 Problem of genetic discrimination164 Man as subject and object of the guided evolution174 Informative society and technologies of the guided evolution180 Controlled evolution as factor of transformation of mentality of modern civilization196 Gene-cultural and techno-cultural coevolution in the space of evolutional singularity198 Civil society. On the threshold of the «post-human future» (The USA, 1998-2007)214 Conclusion. Bio-political problems in the system of modern science and humanitarian knowledge 234 Bibliography282
В.Ф. Cheshko, Glazko v.I. HIGH HUME (BIOTPOWER AND BIOTPOLICY IS IN SOCIETY OF RISK) — 234 —
|