Библиография
1.Adams-Webber, J. (1969). Cognitive complexity and sociality.
British Journal of social anil clinical Psychology 8, 211-216.
2.Adams-Webber, J. (1970a). An analysis of the discriminant validity
' of several repertory grid indices. British Journal of Psychology 61, 83-90.
3.Adams-Webber, J. (1970b). Elicited versus provided constructs in
repertory grid technique: a review. British Journal of medical Psychology
! 43, 349-354.
4.Adams-Webber, J., Schwenkcr, B. and Bar beau, D. (1972). Perso-
| nal constructs and the perception of individual differences. Canadian
Journal of Behavioural Science, 4, 218-224.
5.Agnew, J. and Bannister, D. (1973). Psychiatric diagnosis as a
pseudo specialist language. British Journal of medical Psychology 46, 69.
6.Allison, B. (1972). The development of personal construct systems.
Unpublished manuscript, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland,
j Canada.
- Applebee, A.N. (1975). Developmental changes in consensus in construing within a specified domain. British Journal of Psychology 66, 4 473-480.
- Applebee, A. N. (1976). The development of children's responses to repertory grids. British Journal of social and clinical Psychology 15,
101-102.
9.Arthur, A.Z. (1966). Response bias in the semantic differential.
' British Journal of social and clinical Psychology, 5, 103-107.
10.Baillie-Grohman, R. (1975). The use of a modified form of
repertory grid technique to investigate the extent to which deaf school
leavers tend to use stereotypes. Unpublished M.Sc. dissertation, Universi-
? ty of London.
- Bannister, D. (1959). An application of personal construct theory i (Kelly) to schizoid thinking, Unpublished PhD. thesis. University of 1 London.
-
Bannister, D. (I960). Conceptual structure in thought disordered
i
schizophrenics. Journal of Mental Science 106, 1230-1249. 13. Bannister, D. (1962a). The nature and measurement of schizophrenic thought disorder. Journal of Mental Science 108, 825-842. 14. Bannister, D. (1962). Personal construct theory: a summary and 1 experimental paradigm. Acta Psychologies 20, 104-120.
— 161 —