Following after and as a result of Second World War narrowing of sphere of direct normative action of bio-power changed its form, but not efficiency. Indirect ?through the system of the organs of power of recommendations and advices scientifically grounded and supported authority, influence of bio-power appeared even more effective and no less powerful, than before. Relations two constituents of evolution of man – genetic and socio-cultural are obviously multiple-valued. It once again confirms nonlinear character their gene-cultural coevolution: development of somatic life takes a place irrespective to of concrete social changes. Legislative and executive structures which actually can set certain norms and control their observance come forward as proprietors of bio-power. However by non-obvious appearance, the possessors of bio-power are transmitters scientific knowledge ? researchers and experts, on whose conclusion the members of parliament, governments, judges et cetera lean really or declarative. Science in technogenic civilization acts part of the hidden or obvious mechanism of acceptance of political decisions. In such situation scientists appear under the strongest political pressing, and, consequently, – conflict of interests (professional and political). The paternalistic model of co-operation of society and science takes a place as follows: society inquires science about possibility of decision of arising up problem, and the last orders society the method of its decision. After medicine such chart of relations becomes firmly established and for other areas of natural science – as they acquire economic and political meaningfulness. Science becomes religion of technogenic civilization, decision the basic questions of life of man in this world. With birth of gene technologies a situation acquires drastic alternations. In face of global crisis and possibility of loss humanity of own identity a scientific association already cannot ignore aspiring of other side to more free and equal in rights dialog. Thus, a science place modified acquisition of political value substantial appearance into society. In democratic civil society these changes can be defined as achievement of parity between scientific knowledge and everyday presentations and mental stereotypes. Procedure of logical and empirical verification of scientific knowledge during social practice is replaced by social verification. The mutual additionalness of objectively-rationalistic and socially-ethics constituents of scientific theory lies in basis of last ones. In practice it means changing of priorities one or another constituent. — 215 —
|