|
453 10. Pratkanis, A.R., Farquhar, P.H., Silbert, S., & Hearst, J. (1989). Decoys produce contrast effects and alter choice probabilities. University of California, Santa Cruz. II. Kenrick, D. Т., & Guttieres, S.E. (1980). Contrast effects in judgements of attractiveness: When beauty becomes a social probern. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38,131-140. 12. Higgins, E.T., Rholes, W.S., & Jones, C.R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154. 13. Heath, L., Acklin, M., & Wiley, K. (1991). Cognitive heuristics and AIDS risk assessment among physicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1859- 1867. 14. Rogers, E.M., & Dearing, J. W. (1988), Agenda-setting research: Where has it been, Where is it going? In J.A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook II (pp. 555-594). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. 15. McCombs, M.E., & Shaw, D.L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187. 16. lyengar, S., & Kinder, D.R. (1987). News that matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 17. Цит. по: Rogers and Dearing, Agenda-setting research. 18, Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39,341-350. 19. Gonzales, M.H.,Aronson, E., & Costan^o, M. (1988). Increasing the effectiveness of energy auditors: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1046- 1066. 20. Meyerowitz, В.E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52,500-510. 21. Asch, S. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41,258-290. 22. Jones, E.E., Rock, L., Shaver, K.G., Goethals, G.R., & Ward, L.M. (1968). Pattern of performance and ability attribution: An unexpected primacy effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 317-340. 23. Aronson, J.M., & Jones, E.E. (1992). Inferring abilities after influencing performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 277-299. 24. Zukier, ff. (1982). The dilution effect: The role of the correlation and dispersion of predictor variables in the use of nondiagnostic information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43,1163-1174. — 463 —
|