language development and disorders. /. Psychol, 1953, 35, 155-160. Половые различия 657 83. VcCarthy, Dorothea. Language development in children. In L. Carmichael (Ed.), Manual of child psychology. (2nd Ed.) N. Y.: Wiley, 1954 Pp. 492-630. 84. VcClelland, D. et al. The achievement motive. N. Y.: Appeleton-Century- Crofts, 1953. 85. VcGehee, W. A study of retarded children in the elementary school. Peabody Coll. Contr. Educ, 1939, No. 246. 86. McNemar, Q. The revision of the Stanford-Binet Scale: an analysis of the standardization data. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1942. 87. McNemar, Q., and Terman, L. M. Sex differences in variational tenlency. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1936, 18, No. 1. 88. Mead, Margaret. Growing up in New Guinea. N. Y.; Morrow, 1930. 89. Mead, Margaret. Sex and temperament in the primitive societies. N. Y: Morrow, 1935. 90. Mead, Margaret. Male and female, a study of the sexes in a changing world. N. Y: Morrow, 1949. 91. Milner, Esther. Effects of sex role and social status on the early adolescent personality. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1949, 40, 231—325. 92. Moore, H. T. Further data concerning sex differences. /. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1922, 17, 210-214. 93. Munn, N. L. Handbook of psychological research on the rat. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1950. 94. Muste, Myra J., and Sharpe, Doris F. Some influential factors in the determination of aggressive behavior in preschool children. Child Develpm., 1947, 18, 11-28. 95. Paterson, D. G., et al. Minnesota Mechanical Ability Tests. Minneapolis: Univer. Minn. Press, 1930. 96. Pearson, K. The chances of death and other studies in evolution. London: Arnold, 1897. Vol. I. 97. Porteus, S. D. The measurement of intelligence: 643 children examined by the Binet and Porteus tests. /. educ. Psychol, 1918, 9, 13—31. 98. Pressey, L. W. Sex differences shown by 2544 school children on a group scale of intelligence, with special reference to variability. /. appl. Psychol, 1918, 2, 323-340. 99. Prothro, E. Т., and Perry, H. T. Group differences in performance on the Meier Art Test. J. appl Psychol, 1950, 34, 96-97. — 521 —
|