|
46.Eriksen C. W. and Lazarus R. S. Perceptual defense and projective tests.—“Supplement to Journal of abn. and soc. psychol.”, 1952, v. 47. 47.Eriksen C, W. and Pierce J. Defense mechanisms. In: L. F. Borgatta and W. Lambert (eds.). Handbook of personality theory and research. Chicago, 1968. 48.Frank L. K. Projective methods for the study of personality. — “J. of psychol.”, 1939, v. 8. 49.Freeman F. S. Theory and practice of psychological testing. New Delhi, 1971. 50.Freud A. The Ego and the mechanisms of defence. N. Y., 1946. 51.Gardner R. W. et al. Cognitive control: a study of individual consistencies in cognitive behavior. N. Y., 1959. 52.Handbook of projective techniques (ed. by L. Murstein). N. Y., 1960. 53.Hartman H. Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. In: D. Rapaport (ed.). Organization and pathology of thought. N. Y., 1951. 54.Hîlmes D. S. Dimensions of projection. — “Psychol. Bull.”, 1968, v. 69. 55.King G. F. A theoretical and experimental conisideration of Rorschach Human movement response. — “Psychological monographs general and applied”, 1958, v. 72. 56.Klein G. S. Perception, motives and personality. N. Y„ 1970. 57.Êlîpfer D., Davidsîn H. The Rorschach technique: an introductory manual. N. Y., 1962. 58.Laplanche J., Pontalis J. B. Delimitation du concept freudien de projection. — “Bull. de psychol.”, 1963, v. 225. 59.Lazarus R. S. A substitufive-defense conception of apperceptive fantasy. In: J. Kagan and G. S. Lesser (eds.) Contemporary issues in thematic apperceptive methods. Springfield, 1961. 60.Lazarus R. S., Eriksen C. W. and Fînda C. P. Personality dynamics and auditory perceptual recognition. — “J. of Personality”, 1951, v. 19. 61.Levin K. A dynamic theory of personality Selected papers. N. Y., 1935. 62.Levine R., Chein I. and Murphy G. The relation of the intensity of a need to the amount of perceptual distortion. — “J. Psychol.”, 1942, v. 13. 63.Loosli-Ustery M. Manual pratique du teste de Rorschach. Paris, 1965. 64.McCleland D. C, Atkinson J. W. The projective expression of need: I. The effect of different intensities of the hunger drive on perception.—“J. of Psychol.”, 1948, v. 25. 65.Morgan C., Murray H. A. A method for investigation fantasies.—“Neurol. Psychiatr.”, 1935. 66.Muññhielli R. La notion de projection.— “Bull. de psychol.”, 1963, v. 225. 67.Murràó Í. Explorations in personality. N. Y., 1938. 68.Murràó Í. Thematic Apperception Test Manual. Cambridge, 1943. 69.Murràó Í. Preparation for scaffold of a comprehensive system. In: S. Koch (ed.) Psychology: a study of a science. N. Y., 1957. — 79 —
|