Whalen, P. J., Kagan, J., Cook, R. G., Davis, C., Kim, H., Polis, S., McLaren, D. G., Somerville, L. H., McLean, A. A., Maxwell, J. C., and T. Johnston Human amygdala responsivity to masked fearful eye whites // Science 306 (2004): 2061. Young, L. J., Young, M., and E. A. Hammock Anatomy and neurochemistry of the pair bond // Journal of Comparative Neurology 493 (2005): 51–57. Глава 27. Художественные универсалиии австрийский экспрессионизмAiken, N. E. The Biological Origins of Art. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998. Cohen, P. Next big thing in English: Knowing they know that you know // New York Times, April 1, 2010. Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1859. Darwin, C. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1871. Darwin, C. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1872. Dijkstra, B. Idols of Perversity: Fantasies of Feminine Evil in Fin-de-Si?cle Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. Dissanayake, E. What Is Art For? Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1988. Dissanayake, E. Homo Aestheticus: Where Art Came from and Why. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1995. Dutton, D. The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution. New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2009. Fechner, G. T. Introduction to Aesthetics. Leipzig: Breitkoff & Hartel, 1876. Hughes, R. Lucian Freud: Paintings. London: Thames and Hudson, 1987. Iverson, S., Kupfermann, I., and E. R. Kandel Emotional States and Feelings / In: Principles of Neural Science . 4th ed. E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, T. Jessell, eds. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000. Pp. 982–997. Kimball, R. Nice things // Times Literary Supplement, March 20, 2009: 10–11. Kris, E. Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art . New York: International Universities Press, 1952. Kris, E., and E. H. Gombrich The Principles of Caricature // British Journal of Medical Psychology 17 (1938): 319–342. Lang, P. J. The varieties of emotional experience: A meditation on James – Lange theory // Psychological Review 101 (1994): 211–221. — 376 —
|