|
[108] 47. Runciman, op. cit, p. 158. [109] 48. Ibid. [110] 49. Lambert, Medieval Heresy, p. 108. [111] 50. Lambert, The Cathars, pp. 240 and 242. [112] 51. Ibid, p. 242. [113] 52. Cited in ibid, p. 139. [114] 53. Strayer, op. cit, p. 247. [115] 54. Lambert, The Cathars, p. 139. [116] 55. Guirdham, op. cit, p. 24. [117] 56. Lambert, The Cathars, p. 160. [118] 57. Guirdham, op. cit., p. 23. [119] 58. Ibid. [120] 59. O'Shea, op. cit, p. 8. [121] 60. Guirdham, op. cit, p. 95. [122] 61. Oldenbourg, op. cit, pp. 283–284, and Lambert, The Cathars, p. 125. [123] 62. Guirdham, op. cit, p. 95. [124] 63. See Barber, op. cit, pp. 203–225. [125] 64. Мартин Барбер отвергает аргумент Вейль, который он рассматривает как следствие ее «беспечного отношения к свидетельствам» и «фундаментально антиисторического» подхода. [126] 65. Cited in ibid, p. 206. [127] 66. Oldenbourg, op. cit, p. 23. [128] 67. Ibid, p. 24. [129] 68. Ibid. [130] 69. Burl, op. cit, p. 19. [131] 70. See Sumption, op. cit, p. 90; O'Shea, op. cit, p. 20. [132] 71. Geoffrey Wigoder (ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Judaism, The Jerusalem Publishing House, 1989, p. 514. [133] 72. Сообщение Вениамина из Туделы, cited in Sumption, op. cit, p. 90. [134] 73. Cited in Sumption, op. cit, p. 90. [135] 74. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th edn, London, 1991, Micro — paedia, 11:946–947. [136] 75. Ibid, 3: 686–687. [137] 76. Ibid, 11: 946–7; 3: 686–687. [138] 77. Sumption, op. cit, pp. 29–30. [139] 78. Oldenbourg, op. cit, p. 26. [140] 79. Ibid, p. 230–231. [141] 80. Sumption, op. cit, p. 30; Lambert, Medieval Heresy, p. 83. [142] 81. Guirdham, op. cit, p. 96. [143] 82. Lambert, The Cathars, p. 149. [144] 83. Oldenbourg, op. cit, p. 61. [145] 84. O'Shea, op. cit, p. 41. [146] 85. Oldenbourg, op. cit, p. 61. [147] 86. Guirdham, op. cit, p. 16. [148] 87. Barber, op. cit, p. 216. [149] 88. Oldenbourg, op. cit, p. 51. [150] 89. Ibid, p. 51. [151] 90. Ibid, p. 69. [152] 91. Ibid, p. 70. [153] 92. Lambert, The Cathars, p. 160. — 433 —
|